[So we’re back at square one - who is Obama?]
Nope, we are WORSE than “square one” - we are under the control of a pliable, easily led, narcissist that would do whatever he is told so long as he gets to claim the glory and is idolized!
THOSE are dangerous people, because they have no reasoning behind their decisions! I would more respect a dyed-in-the-wool Marxist, because at least he has conviction - Obama is a rogue NUT CASE!!
This really is the question, all this other stuff is interesting, but pertinent only to what it tells us about Bam. Americans usually have a pretty good sense by now of what their President is about and how he will react in a difficult situation. This is usually based upon extensive scrutiny during the campaign and his time in office by the media.
In my mind this is the biggest risk and failure of the media, we have no idea who this guy is, what he is about and what he will do when difficult decisions with no clear winning approach are placed in front of him (like Afghanistan).
We are learning, however. Van Jones, ACORN, the Olympics, teleprompters, etc (and there is a long list) are a pretty good indication that we have a serious problem, we are dealing with an empty suit narcissist with no philosophical/personal foundation who is not really that bright.
He is so vulnerable to being manipulated by so many people. It does not bode well for us, especially if things get nasty.
schu
I agree. If he was a dyed in the wool Marxist we could push and he could push back - things could be hammered out. As is, it might be like pushing on a string. We say “this”, he says, “fine” and he goes and does whatever. It’s weird. The problem is that easily led narcissists don’t get far on their own - some alpha male is pulling the situation.... to where and for what is part of the unknown.
I did not read your post before I just wrote essentially the same thing as you. So we must both be right! :)