Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gandalftb
Good post but I have a feeling that the deal won't go through. How will the Iranian hardliners be able to justify sending their entire stockpile of several years work out of the country when they refuse to even talk about even a temporary suspension of enrichment? Seems like a massive concession, and its not even something that would satisfy the Israelis, because it leaves Irans entire nuclear infrastructure intact and operational.
8 posted on 10/05/2009 9:32:57 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: maquiladora
The deal got signed late last Friday. It was the controlling Mullahs that actually pushed for the deal.

Iran could continue to import all the Moly 99 they need for about $1 million a year. That's nothing, why not do that? Why give up all that uranium, that cost the Iranians hundreds of millions to enrich to 4.4%?

Because Iran is stuck at 4.4% LEU, per my previous post and need much more knowledge and time to get the "lead" (MoF6) out of their UF4 in order to convert it into UF6.

There is also a political problem in Iran = hardliners (Ahmadinejad) vs. moderates (Rafsanjani). If Iran keeps the uranium, they will, verrrrry slowly, get weapons-grade uranium. The Mullahs know that the hardliners, led by the Revolutionary Guards, will contol the nukes and take over and radicalize the government and the entire Middle East. That whole Hidden Imam, Armageddon thing.

The Mullahs are barely in control now and they know that actual nukes will cause an internal revolution in Iran.

11 posted on 10/05/2009 9:53:41 AM PDT by gandalftb (An appeaser feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson