Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fukino & TerriK
Oct. 2, 2009 | MissTickly (aka TerriK)

Posted on 10/02/2009 3:35:27 PM PDT by MissTickly

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-258 next last
To: MissTickly

The record shows obama was adopted by his Indonesian father. So he would have an amended birth certificate if that was the case.


181 posted on 10/02/2009 11:09:14 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

Miss Tickly,

Am I correct to presume the following? Thank you in advance.

1. If the birth certificate has been amended, the last amendment is considered by the Hawaii DOH to be the original.

2. That would make possibly 3 birth certificates.
A. The one at birth
B. The one amended when adopted
C. The amended one showing Obama as father again

Hawaii birth certificates show at the bottom if they have been amended. Why does the one Obama produced not show any amendments?


182 posted on 10/02/2009 11:11:34 PM PDT by Leddaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

MHG,

Thank You! That helps me understand a little better.


183 posted on 10/02/2009 11:11:36 PM PDT by Leddaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

“Are you certain that there are any fees associated with changing/amending a record. It would be in the interest of the state to have accurate records so they may not exist.”

I was told twice by the OIP that the agency should inform me they don’t exist.

The notice of requester I received has the box listed and unchecked. (box)’The agency does not maintain the records you requested’

I am sure they exist. They cited HRS 338-18 to deny me access. That statute cover vital records and related material according to them.

They exist alright.


184 posted on 10/02/2009 11:15:09 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Leddaddy

“1. If the birth certificate has been amended, the last amendment is considered by the Hawaii DOH to be the original.”

No, the original (or supplementary adopted BC) would be marked through the incorrect info, the corrected info would be written in. And it would be stamped or mark ‘amended’ and endorsed.

An accepted and recorded amended record is just a edited original BC.

Does that help?


185 posted on 10/02/2009 11:18:07 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

Are you saying you know this or think this is true? I think it’s likely more than one alteration/adoption has occurred.

Who knows what all has gone on...

Fukino never says she saw the original BC in OCT.2008. Only that she saw it was on record.

Is that because it is a sealed original? I think yes. She isn’t allowed to see an original sealed BC.


186 posted on 10/02/2009 11:22:00 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

School records in Indonesia showed him with his mother second husband’s name - Soerto and the record classified him as Indonesian. That is why I think the birth cert. was amended when Obama was adopted by his step dad.

His mom might have fibbed and told the school he was Soerto’s son and an Indonesian in order to get him in the school when he was not. Who the heck knows for sure! But as you are getting clues that the birth certificate was amended, I would suspect it was for adoption.


187 posted on 10/02/2009 11:43:56 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

I’m beginning to wonder if Dr. Frankenstein had a 20th century project. Or he was beamed in from an alien ship.

RE the two parent issue: Not that it is definitive, but w/ Clinton, Obama, McCaskill ‘vetted’ McCain, the language specified TWO US citizen parents. IIRC, Obama tried to change it to one and failed.

So, even if he was born in Hawaii AND the parents were not married, it seems like there is a good case for Obama lacking Natural Born Citizen status, although he would be a native born citizen. [I hope for change in the Executive office!]


188 posted on 10/03/2009 12:08:45 AM PDT by FreeStateYank (I want my country and constitution back, now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

Miss Tickly,

Then at least the one he produced should show his adoption? I am on your side that there is a load of dung in all of this!!


189 posted on 10/03/2009 12:09:36 AM PDT by Leddaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob; All

Please consider that the founding fathers drew upon their education, classical studies, common sense, and referenced many philosophical works. Vattel’s “The Law of Nations” [1758], a contemporary treatise on the natural rights and responsibilities of nations, would have been one such source.

http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel_01.htm

BOOK I.
OF NATIONS CONSIDERED IN THEMSELVES.

CHAP. XIX.
OF OUR NATIVE COUNTRY, AND SEVERAL THINGS THAT RELATE TO IT.

§ 212. Citizens and natives.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.


190 posted on 10/03/2009 12:09:42 AM PDT by RebelTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

The question about whether Barry Soetoro’s adult use of Indonesian citizenship (perhaps dual citizenship) would or would not nullify NBC status if he ever had it is interesting, but I think that the coverup is about this very scenario. He knows that if it can be shown that he had and used Indonesian citizenship on into his adult years, and has been trying to cover up the fact, he is finished, whether he is technically NBC or not. Zero credibility. I think the current obfuscation we are seeing from HI DOH is due to the fact that his BC is amended and shows Lolo and Ann as the parents of Barry Soetoro.


191 posted on 10/03/2009 6:16:15 AM PDT by Genoa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

btt


192 posted on 10/03/2009 6:41:42 AM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Bingo!


193 posted on 10/03/2009 7:55:23 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Really, how did you come to that conclusion???


194 posted on 10/03/2009 9:27:29 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Why did McLame need a special Senate resolution???


195 posted on 10/03/2009 9:29:22 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

You can get that answer on Leo’s site!!!


196 posted on 10/03/2009 9:33:40 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

btt


197 posted on 10/03/2009 9:49:42 AM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

That was not my intent but followed from the comments wintertime made in response to my comment to another poster. I will not accept accusations attacking my motives from him or anyone else. Particularly when he ignored the genesis of the comment and turned it into something it was not.

And there was plenty of other comments centered on the main subject made by posters not attacking me.


198 posted on 10/03/2009 11:26:24 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Your comment wrt to the Judge shows just what kind of problem we are dealing with as regards citizenship. It is that kind of imprecision which has allowed millions of anchor babies to become citizens.

There is also a problem with positing two kinds of natural-born subjects.


199 posted on 10/03/2009 11:30:05 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

Sounds like a direct question “Are there any fees associated with amending a birth certificate?” needs to be asked. Apparently the state is not volunteering any information not directly asked.

It might also be helpful to have a Hawaii native attempt to amend their BC without including any fees to see what happens.


200 posted on 10/03/2009 11:34:01 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson