Polanski was not the only “monster”.
Larry King Live - Feb. 24, 2003
GEIMER: I didn’t tell her. I actually later that night I called my then — who is now my ex-boyfriend, and...
KING: How old was he?
GEIMER: He was 17, and I was almost 14.
...
KING: You were a virgin?
GEIMER: I just figured I wasn’t — no, I wasn’t.
KING: You were not a virgin?
GEIMER: No, I had a boyfriend for quite some months before that.
KING: So you had had sex before?
GEIMER: And embarrassing as it is, I’ll tell you, yes, we did it once. So that was about as close as you can get to being a virgin but just one step away.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0302/24/lkl.00.html
Her grand jury testimony says “twice” by the way.
KING: Maybe it’s because of the years, but neither of you feel particularly angry at Roman Polanski.
GEIMER: No. Not anymore. Not even then. I mean, it just...
KING: No?
GEIMER: Well, yes, I was angry because he was the cause of the publicity and the publicity was the worst thing that ever happened to me.
KING: But not angry that he had sex with you.
GEIMER: The publicity was so terrible, that — and so immediate that it just overshadowed everything that happened that night.
A 17 y/o and a 13 y/o? Dumb, horny kids.
A 43 y/o and a 13 y/o? Statutory rape, at a minimum.