Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ari-freedom
It is a theory based on rhetorical argument as opposed to other theories that are based on mathematical equations

Cell theory, germ theory, plate tectonics?

But what if they can’t be trusted?

I trust the massive general agreement as it grew up in the absence of corrupting influences. Actually, I don't trust the scientists. I looked at the evidence and found it to be by far the most convincing scientific theory.

47 posted on 09/30/2009 5:07:13 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat

“I trust the massive general agreement as it grew up in the absence of corrupting influences. Actually, I don’t trust the scientists. I looked at the evidence and found it to be by far the most convincing scientific theory.”

But I looked at the evidence and wasn’t convinced at all. So I am told that I must be a stupid idiot for doubting Darwin (and global warming and all sorts of other stuff) and that I must trust the scientists.


51 posted on 09/30/2009 5:34:23 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Fiscal conservatism without social conservatism is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson