“It’s pretty much a direct argument against abortion and eugenics.”
No it’s not because the general problem with evolutionist thinking is that you can use it to explain anything you want and its opposite. It is the theory of que sera, sera.
The proof is in the pudding: the most accomplished evolutionists were and still are strong advocates of abortion and/or eugenics.
That makes no sense.
The proof is in the pudding: the most accomplished evolutionists were and still are strong advocates of abortion and/or eugenics.
People who misused a scientific theory and didn't even bother to read all of Darwin's works. If you believe eugenics is Darwin's fault, then a logically consistent position for you to take would be to hold gun manufacturers responsible for the actions of criminals who commit crimes using guns.