“Why would a company or a government risk being sued or overthrown through the use of a vaccine? Why not target the places where population continues to greatly expand, rather than countries in which population has been DECREASING for many years?
I applaud the background work, but in the end, this is an implausible line of “reasoning.”
Reason does not seem to be a part of the goals of these envirowhacks. They just want to save the planet.
I’m not getting the vaccine and neither are my five kids. We are prepared and ready to live in our home self sufficient for three months, even if the water and electricity are off.
Jen
And yes, guns are locked and loaded...
I dunno that I buy this tinfoil hat theory either, but I DO have a quite plausible answer for one of those questions: the same yahoos around this globe who would want to do such a thing are also avowed anti-capitalists... their first targets would be the peoples of the industrialized world who are the cause for the perceived "sustainability" crisis. Widespread infertility in the first world countries would thus solve their two biggest problems at once: industrialization/capitalism and the 'destruction' of the planet.