Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT; Al B.; SolidWood; Leisler; greyfoxx39; Tennessee Nana; EternalVigilance; ...
CharlesWayneCT (devoted RomneyBOT finally admitting
he can't find anything wrong with a single URL
critical of backstabber (to GOv.Palin) Mitt Romney:
"step 2, calling all your buddies."

If you want.

FRiends, CharlesWayneCT wrote: "repeat a lie often enough, and ..."

But then he was asked:

"Listen, FRiend, if you are referring to post #21,
which URL listed is a "lie"?"

So at the end of the day, CharlesWayneCT assents.

120 posted on 09/29/2009 9:06:59 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: Diogenesis
Charles is a RomneyBot for sure. That marks him an annoying creature, but he's basically harmless. The best thing to do with Charles is to ignore him. He may not go away and will continue to spew gobbledygook. If at all possibe, the best thing to do is not feed his bloated ego.
124 posted on 09/29/2009 9:36:57 AM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: Diogenesis

what, couldn’t wait for your posse? Have to actually do something yourself?

Your question is a non-sequitor, as it would be absurd to contemplate a URL being a “lie”. A URL is a link to a page, and so far as I can tell all the pages that you link to actually exist; and if one didn’t we wouldn’t call the URL a lie, we would call it a broken link.

If you want an answer to a question, ask a rational question. The lie is what you say, not what you link (although there are certainly incorrect items within the body of the things you linked to as well, but they were hashed out in other threads).


129 posted on 09/29/2009 9:55:29 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: Diogenesis
Oh, and because you might just eventually figure out how to ask what exactly WAS the lie:

RCP election poll 2008

At no point was McCain up +8 over Obama in the poll averages. According to the RCP website, only ONE poll ever had McCain up that much, USA Today/Gallup 09/05 - 09/07 823 LV 4.0 44 54 McCain +10

But that was almost 2 weeks before your 9/18 "date", and other than that, McCain was only barely over the margin of error in a couple of polls for a day or so, a typical convention bounce no doubt helped tremendously by Obama's stupid convention speech and conservative excitement over Palin.

The last poll to have McCain up (+4) was 9/11, which was a WEEK before your 9/18 date. Rasmussen already had Obama back up +1 by 9/9.

However, I apologize for using the term "lie", You were wrong, but maybe you really believed what you were saying.

BTW, USA Today/Gallup had McCain up +5 in July, and Reuters had McCain up by +5 in August, before he picked Palin. They were obviously outliers.

133 posted on 09/29/2009 10:19:07 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson