here is a detailed breakdown of the FactCheck forgeries.
Including an analysis of the date stamp.
http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/07/27/292/
They are forgeries, plain and simple.
Forgery #1 – The COLB posted on ‘Fight the Smears’ – No Stamp, No Seal, evidence of tampering and forgery. Sandra Ramsey Lines, Ron Polirak, and myself, among others.
Forgery #2 – FactCheck – Two different COLB’s one with a SEAL, however NOT an Official State of Hawaii Department of Health SEAL
Forgery #3 – FactCheck – COLB without a SEAL, image of COLB being held up. High resolution and NO indicating of a SEAL.
So how can there be three versions of a document that Hawaii NEVER issued?
http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/07/27/292/
Yes, that's the same link you posted before. And that MHGinTN has posted several times. And like I said before, it doesn't offer any proof at all that there was ever a missing seal on the FTS COLB. You state it as a given conclusion, but you don't give any evidence to support that conclusion.
Forgery #1 – The COLB posted on ‘Fight the Smears’ – No Stamp, No Seal, evidence of tampering and forgery. Sandra Ramsey Lines, Ron Polirak, and myself, among others.
See, you state "No Seal," but you don't provide any evidence of that in the piece above this statement. Furthermore, Sandra Lines didn't say it was a forgery. And you're still citing Polarik as authority, even though he turned out to be lying about his credentials for a whole year, and faked at least one piece of his 'evidence.'
Forgery #2 – FactCheck – Two different COLB’s one with a SEAL, however NOT an Official State of Hawaii Department of Health SEAL
Forgery #3 – FactCheck – COLB without a SEAL, image of COLB being held up. High resolution and NO indicating of a SEAL.
First, like I said before, a little tweaking in GIMP shows that there are, in fact, signs of a seal there. It's hard to see because of the focus and the shadow, but it's there. And the seal is the only distinction you claim exists between "#2" and "#3".
Second, like I asked before, is it really your contention that Factcheck took eight photographs of "Forgery #2," and then took one photograph of "Forgery #3"? And that in a photography session where they took several photos including the seal, they didn't notice when the document got switched out for one that didn't have a seal at all? And that the Obama campaign would intentionally make a seal-less version and share it with Factcheck for a single photo for no reason, swapping it with the sealed version midway through the photo shoot?