You're argument doesn't hold water.
When the DailyKOS forgery was made, the forger(s) didn't have an embossed stamp that looked like the Hawaiian seal. So the forger goes for second best. Create a ghost image underneath with barely visible distortions until a time that they could produce a facsimile of the Hawaiin raised seal.
Almost two months go by then in early August of 2008. The non-"Factchecker".org come out with their new and improved forgery. However, they still screw up the design of raised seal as seen below:
The Obama Hawaiian COLBs will never be seen in court to cover his @ss.
You're argument doesn't hold water. When the DailyKOS forgery was made, the forger(s) didn't have an embossed stamp that looked like the Hawaiian seal. So the forger goes for second best. Create a ghost image underneath with barely visible distortions until a time that they could produce a facsimile of the Hawaiin raised seal.
Almost two months go by then in early August of 2008. The non-"Factchecker".org come out with their new and improved forgery. However, they still screw up the design of raised seal as seen below:
OK, so what you're saying is that the Obama campaign put online a COLB with a 'ghost' seal, and then two months later shared a COLB with a more visible seal with Factcheck.
But that's wholly inconsistent with the allegation that MHGinTN made in post 359, where he wrote:
"It was his website which first posted a jpg image of a CoLB which lacked a raised seal. When that was called to their attention, they placed a raised seal on the first image and claimed that was then genuine. There is an artifact in the image of the first exhibit which shows up in the second exhibit with the raised seal, but not in the third exhibit claimed by factcheck to be the ‘handled’ CoLB."
So MHGinTN maintained that Obama first posted a COLB that lacked a raised seal entirely, then promptly replaced it on the website with a COLB that DID have a raised seal, whereas you claim that they didn't replace anything until they showed a document to Factcheck in August 2008. And he said that the COLB they gave to Factcheck did NOT have a raised seal, whereas you claim that it DID.
So whose sequence of events is the right one? Because y'all are telling inconsistent and contradictory stories.