Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nufsed

“Inconceivable that the founders wanted future sons of British citizens to be considered “natural born” citizens. Does any one believe they would have?”

I haven’t looked at the federalist papers in years..wouldn’t they have mentioned it? Or did they?


256 posted on 09/28/2009 7:02:12 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: ~Kim4VRWC's~

One example, check out Jay’s (numerous) letter(s) on wanting to prevent foreign entanglements. His well know letter to (presiding over the Con Con) Washington immediately pre-dates the requirement showing up in their drafts.


259 posted on 09/28/2009 7:06:16 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson