Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlo
I was advocating his arrest for election fraud and holding a public office after lying about being qualified. And a subsequent criminal court case.

Actually I was showing two different ways he could be held to prove his qualifications. Upholding the constitution is not a legal issue, it's a political one? You truly are on the wrong side and are a part of the problem.

Since you're so interested in the truth, please post your letter to the WH asking him to open his records. Or are you just here to throw hurdles in our path toward finding the truth?

We did this dance before, much longer. If you don't believe in upholding the constitution or the courts, the secretaries of state, the congress responsibility to do so, I'm out, again. If you do believe it, you can think of more than one way for this to be resolved; as many of us have. Toodles, for now.

188 posted on 09/28/2009 3:42:53 PM PDT by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: nufsed
"I was advocating his arrest for election fraud and holding a public office after lying about being qualified. And a subsequent criminal court case."

Evidence is usually required for such things.

"Upholding the constitution is not a legal issue, it's a political one? You truly are on the wrong side and are a part of the problem."

I didn't say "upholding the constitution" was not a legal issue but a political one. I said that about your allegation of, "...failure of the parties, secretaries of state, congress and courts to do their duty". The constitutionally prescribed procedures for electing a president were followed. If you believe these parties should have done something more, that's not a legal issue, no. It is a political one.

Telling the truth is never part of the problem. Trying to make up laws as you go in order to get a certain result, is.

191 posted on 09/28/2009 4:04:03 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

To: nufsed
"If you don't believe in upholding the constitution or the courts, the secretaries of state, the congress responsibility to do so, I'm out, again. If you do believe it, you can think of more than one way for this to be resolved; as many of us have."

You conveniently left out another possibility. The true one.

Since I do believe in upholding the constitution, I'm not willing to sit quietly while the birthers make up lies and distort the meanings of words in that document, because of the result of an election. I defend that document. The birthers are attacking it.

208 posted on 09/28/2009 4:19:50 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

To: nufsed; LucyT; All

The courts are used (haha) to interpret the law. That check and balance system. The constitution is the law of the land. Since the states are obligated to protect their citizens..it seems fitting to utilize state courts to make sure the candidates are legitimate..if all other normal routes fail to prove they are. In this day and age (after 9-11), and with the corruption surrounding us, (acorn etc), it’s time to close any and all loopholes. We have to demand the loopholes be closed.


219 posted on 09/28/2009 4:58:31 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson