The issue that arises is one of fraud.
That would be one area for sure. Now you can’t just go holler fraud but rather you need some reliable evidence that fraud has been committed, correct? I guess that would be were we are today in trying to determine/find some reliable evidence. I know we have a lot of assertions but what reliablity do they have? I think that is one problem the courts are having. JMO and I’m not a legal expert by any imagination.
The primary case is that we have a constitutional requirement and it is clear from the failure of the parties, secretaries of state, congress and courts to do their duty to uphold the constitution that the issue needs to be addressed to ensure that the person in office actually meets the qualification.
Reason 3 is because I said so and I'm the dad. LOL!