How about going to court with publicly admitted facts? Such as:
1)His father is a foreign national who was never permanently domiciled in the US.
and
2)His BIRTH was governed by a foreign government.
Bring a case, with supporting historical documents, alleging he can not be a Natural BORN citizen due to those two publicly admitted facts. It gets punted to SCOTUS. Let them either drop it, or address it.
At least it has the benefit of alleging facts instead of suspicions. But....
"1)His father is a foreign national who was never permanently domiciled in the US."
Doesn't matter in the least.
"2)His BIRTH was governed by a foreign government."
How is a birth "goverened by a foreign government"? You mean that he also had citizenship in another country by the terms of that country's laws?
Doesn't matter. Another country's laws don't govern us. No other country has the power to decide which American is or isn't "natural born".
So I have no doubt that any case that got beyond standing questions with only these factual assertions, would be dismissed without a trial.
I'm especially interested in the supporting historical document outlining how a birth in Hawaii was governed by a foreign government.
After speaking with a sos office, I’ve decided they are the ones who should be the defendants. That’s why obama is getting away with this. He doesn’t have to prove anything to anyone. The Secretary of States are the ones who take the declaration of candidacy. It’s not a federal declaration, it’s a state declaration. I would at least like to know what Alan Keyes has to say about that.