I like to give people the benefit of the doubt, especially knowing that any of us could make an unintentional error. I think it was unintentional, or maybe fox was referring to the previous indictment.
"Looking over the previous posts of “supremedoctrine”, I find some solidly conservative expressions..."
I too like to give the benefit of the doubt to people and also looked at some of supremedoctrine's previous posts, and so when reading the headline, because the integrity of FreeRepublic is solid (imo)I personally, maybe incorrectly, assume that the majority (not all) of posts are genuine and rely heavily upon the judgement of the members here (I also research). I in no way am trying to be self righteous or anything else, but a story like this is pretty outstanding because of the impications/consequences of it and with the pressure of us and like minded people, we can acheive so much. So....that was the reason that I (along with others) was questioning it.