I have to admit, it was great fun to construct such an experiment on a blissfully pleasant Sunday afternoon in the Fall in Connecticut. How's Experiment #1 going for you anyway?
So - with a perceptible hint of hesitation in your writing - you say you have an MS in some "science" of some kind, have you?
Clearly for what ever that degree is worth, or (hopefully) completed syllabus was supposedly intended to teach you, it did not prevent you from making the fatal cognitive mistake of failing to read or understand the question as was posed.
Of course, if you were any kind of scientist with any amount of accomplishment whatsoever you should have noticed from the start that there was no argument made at all, but merely a clear and simple challenge: "So someone tell me, how would you do an experiment to test for intelligent design?"
"Oops!" is right. You're busted. One typically sees that level of gross conceptual and cognitive disconnection in the logic of only the most novice of babbling freshman!
You see, dear storm-drain, you are a perfect example of today's materialist evolutionary acolyte who fails to read and to answer the question as posed, reads into the question more than it asked, alleges a context for a question that was never established and winds up looking like the very fool the instructors of his allegedly completed "science" curriculum doubtlessly hoped he'd never become.
But alas, clearly you have become....
Sucks to be you.
Oh, yes, and by the way I happen hold 3 completed undergraduate and graduate degrees specifically in life sciences namely Biology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry.
You have demonstrated by way of your postings to others on this thread and in your posting to me in particular, no capacity for critical thinking or reasoning as a natural scientist could or would be expected either to critically think or to reason.
As such, readers are left to speculate as to whether that MS you allegedly have in some as yet un-identified "science" might be something like "Library science" or possibly even "Fashion science."
Now, one supposes that principles embodied in the Dewey decimal system could be challenging for elementary school children, and possibly, too, for some lesser-accomplished adults who have equal levels of difficulty negotiating the nuances of, say, the Sunday Comics, perhaps, yet the metaphysical possibility exists that by their reading your Master's thesis such mysteries might become more clear to both populations.
Or for those who can't seem to decide whether the red shoes go with the tan handbag, perhaps they could consult your Master's thesis for some guidance in what is for some that tortuous decision making process.
Next thing you may say to impress us, is that your MS had a dual concentration in Library AND Fashion science, and in that accomplishment we should all be awed.
I believe what would ultimately impress most readers about you at this point, however, storm-plug, would be firmly establishing in everyone's mind, what is your level of personal competence to be able to successfully decipher what are the inherent differences between an "argument" made and a "question" asked.