Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stormer
That's not an answer to the questions...

Do you consider that nothing can be verified as accurate and true unless it can be reduced to a scientific experiment?

Why on earth do you need to experiment to test for something that is so patently obvious to the casual observer and even Dawkins admits that the universe and life give the appearance (illusion) of design?

And by the way, I would love to read the conclusion you say Einstein reached.

“I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.”

Albert Einstein

I never said anything about Einstein believing in a personal God. Stop putting words in my mouth and misrepresenting what I said.

My question was merely .....So, Newton and Einstein were wrong when they concluded that the universe must have had a designer based on their observations?

58 posted on 09/27/2009 5:23:21 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

I don’t care about their conclusions. I care about their evidence.

Argument from authority is not science. Especially from people educated in one field, but pronouncing in another.

Evidence is science.


61 posted on 09/27/2009 7:00:46 PM PDT by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

“My question was merely...”

And I’m asking for your proof.


65 posted on 09/27/2009 7:13:45 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson