Replies

More unadulterated codswallop. In an undergraduate class, students are expected to learn the material that is presented. They don't have the cerebral firepower to understand a fraction of any single discipline (let alone argue against it), and yet the morons who crafted this article expect them to do just that. Did any of these guys ever even go to college? You want to challenge a paradigm? It's easy: Go to college; get good grades; get a fellowship (or two); earn a Masters; then a PhD; do some post-doc work; re-invent the wheel. If some snot-nose walks into a class and expects to argue with a professor using “evidence” he or she got out of a Discovery Institute brochure, they are really, truly, seriously deluded.

More unadulterated codswallop. In an undergraduate class, students are expected to learn the material that is presented.

That's the way to educate, isn't it.

Just demand that they vomit back the material given them.

Don't let them think or question, should they dare to question the all-knowing professor. The nerve of some students. Honestly.....

In an undergraduate class, students are expected to learn the material that is presented. They don't have the cerebral firepower to understand a fraction of any single discipline...

You didn't Im sure

Wow, just puke up whatever your liberal handlers indoctrinate you with, eh?

More unadulterated codswallop. In an undergraduate class, students are expected to learn the material that is presented. They don't have the cerebral firepower to understand a fraction of any single discipline (let alone argue against it), and yet the morons who crafted this article expect them to do just that.

Again, the typical evo tactic of conflating educational level with intelligence.

Likely in any college profs class there are going to be some students who have equal or greater cerebral firepower than the professor. They may not have had the opportunities to study that the prof had, but that in no way is an indication that they are not capable of understanding what the prof is teaching.

Funny how evos want drones who don't question anything.

Tell me, if you're so sure that the ToE is correct, why do you object to students challenging the professor. You'd think that any professor worth his salt would appreciate a student who is thinking and trying. And again, if the ToE is correct, the prof should be glad to set the student straight.

At least a student who challenges is motivated.