[Jabba the Nutt]

First, don't misrepresent what Beck said. He didn't say that McCain-Palin would be worse for American than Obama-Biden. He said a McCain presidency would be worse for America than the Obama presidency.

His case is basically that many McCain policies are the same as Obama policies. Since McCain is a Republican, he could get these policies passed by splitting the GOP.

Obama has united the GOP against his policies. McCain would have split the GOP, as Obama as split the Democrats.

In any case, Beck has expressed his opinion. Why Republicans are jumping down his throat is beyond me? Why even get upset?

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>First, don't misrepresent what Beck said. He didn't say that McCain-Palin would be worse for American than Obama-Biden. He said a McCain presidency would be worse for America than the Obama presidency.

I posted the truth! For your information, Palin gave the campaign a huge boost and saved McCain from a Goldwater level loss. She would have been a big power and influence as McCain's VP. So, when Beck says McCain Presidency, he's talking about McCain and Palin. Much better for America than Obama-Biden.

Obama may be uniting conservatives and traditionalists, but the GOP remains in a deep coma. Without an infusion of fresh leadership the GOP will continue to lose in 2010 and 2012.

[4woodenboats]

I hadn't heard the qoute before, but I have heard the concept before. I believe it was bigfootbob from our WA chapter that suggested it would be easier to get rid of a totally incompetent radical lefty than it would a RINO who acquiesed at the hint of any controversy.

I don't remember if the contest was Rienheart vs Darcy or Cantwell vs McClintock (sp? Safeco guy)