I listened to it. Mark Levin is saying that Glenn read a whole paragraph from his book on air.
Really? It must have been a real short paragraph. Have you seen Glenn’s attention span?
Does Glenn come up with original material? Yes he does so all the time. Is it possible that he could have read a paragraph of Levin’s work. It is possible, but I don’t see it. Is Glenn ripping of Levin when he boils a frog? Huh? Is he ripping of Levin if he talks about Acorn or Cass Sustein? No.
Is Glenn laying out the wonderful prose and logic of Levin and not crediting Levin? Ah, no, Glenn doesn’t do prose like Levin. Glen is goofy remember!? I don’t see how it is possible. Levin must be jealous and overly sensitive to something we are not aware.
But Levin, could make it easy to end the speculation and man up and tell us the specific. It is actually an act of lying and deception to lead people with half of the story, because it allows one’s imagination to fill in gaps.
Man up, Levin, tell the whole story and not just the part that makes you look good!
We're jealous of Beck's success. You caught us.
Mark isn’t the only one Beck has borrowed from and he’s not the only one p.o.’ed about it. Just as O’Reilly takes credit for Glenn’s reporting, Beck does his share as well and it’s unfair.
I’ve been listening to Mark for years and have watched Beck since his show started on CNN and there are many examples of Beck taking Mark’s long researched material and repeating it as if it was his own. Compound that by Glenn using Mark’s theme song as his bumper music on more than one occasion and it seems to me that Glenn does it purposely (albeit very effectively).
There is no doubt that between the two Mark is the intellectual heavy-hitter while Glenn is a self-described “rodeo clown”. I like them both but Glenn should give credit where credit is due. It’s only fair.
With THAT voice? Impossible!