[P-Marlowe]

I can think of dozens of examples where the Bible states that the sun rose or the sun set or the moon and the planets rose or set. We all know, unless you are also heliocentric, that they didn't actually rise or set, they only appeared to based upon an incorrect understanding of the relationships between the bodies.

The Weather Channel and all the meteorologists on TV and in the newspapers always refer to "sun rise" and "sun set." Do they all have an incorrect understanding of the relationships between the bodies?

[Natural Law]

"The Weather Channel and all the meteorologists on TV and in the newspapers always refer to "sun rise" and "sun set.Do they all have an incorrect understanding of the relationships between the bodies?"

Are you equating the using of a grammatical construct that based upon a scientific flaw or a logical fallacy in a weather forecast to your literal accuracy imperative of Scripture?