No, but the examples of cross-species breeding that are observed imply a misclassification of the two specimens. If they can breed, then clearly they are not as divergent as the current classification implies. I believe the taxonomic order is a mess that should be reorganized firstly on the basic principle that organisms which can breed are obviously members of the same species, even if they have become drastically different through the forces of selection. If two organisms cannot breed, it is not necessarily evidence they are not members of the same species, since we have examples of animals which are definitely bred from the same stock, and have not “evolved” into a radically different organism, but have become divergent enough not to be able to produce offspring any longer.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendelian_inheritance
Please note the "long tail" trait encoded in the recessive allele in the first generation, in ONE PARENT ONLY. This parent is thus bred with the other parent with a dominant "short tail" gene, thus the "long tail" trait does not appear in the second generation. But look at the third generation! Then imagine that the long tail is more useful for chasing mice. This leads to better fed cats, with more energy to breed than the short-tailed ones, and in subsequent generations the trait becomes more widespread in the population. The Mendelian laws explain a large part of the evolutionary machinery...