[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

So, we can assume that as long as creationists quote complete sentences the evos can never claim out-of-context quoting ever again?

This is a good example of how you're so focused on identifying trees that you have no concept of the forest, just like with your quest for fallacies.

Evos always assume that since applying the philosophical assumption of naturalism works for technical experiments

Work on grasping the difference between philosophical and methodological naturalism.

[GourmetDan]

"This is a good example of how you're so focused on identifying trees that you have no concept of the forest, just like with your quest for fallacies."

Since I was just using your rationale for not committing quote mining, this would be a good example of how you're so focused on identify trees that you have no concept of the forest. Just like your inability to understand logical fallacy.

"Work on grasping the difference between philosophical and methodological naturalism."

Work on grasping the difference between assuming evolution and observing adaptation.