[tacticalogic]

When that method denies or outright refuses to recognize or even consider the creator's hand in creation, it ceases to be Science.

Can you articulate exactly how it needs to be changed to do that?

[P-Marlowe]

I think my answer to that question was implicit in my prior post.

Did you read it?

Do you accept the premise that there may be something supernatural that cannot be measured or observed which may explain much of what can be measured and observed?