[TigersEye]

When I looked over the Honduran Constitution, it appeared that once Zelaya made his unconstitutional attempt, he not only was to be removed from office, but he lost his citizenship. Did I read it wrong?

No, you read it exactly right. He instantly lost his citizenship for his actions. The legislature and SC actually gave him a pass on that two or three times by not acting on that clause of their constitution. They warned him to cease and desist in those first instances and he did not. They did that for the good of the country because there is no legal obstacle requiring them to have patience with a traitor.

[FreeStateYank]

“He instantly lost his citizenship for his actions.”

Huston, we have a problem. While I am delighted the cringing, boot licking MSM have finally acknowledged his removal from office was legit, the rest of the story needs to be told.

The new meme is Zelaya’s booting from the country ‘wrong’ and not due to his loss of citizenship upon the decision handed down from the Supreme Court.

While the Zelaya crowd have suffered a tactical defeat on one of their main points, the ‘wrongful removal from country’ could be very damaging if successful.

Or at least that’s how it looks to me.

Do readers see the Zelaya crowd being forced back down from this tactic?