Skip to comments.
Book: Bush favored cap and trade
The Hill, Washington, DC ^
| 2009-09-24
| Eric Zimmermann
Posted on 09/24/2009 2:34:26 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
President Bush favored cap and trade, one of this former speechwriters claims in a new book.
In fact, Matt Latimer writes in "Speechless," the President actually ENDORSED the policy in a speech, but no one in the press could figure out what he meant.
Cap-and-trade, which would put a limit on businesses' carbon emissions, barely passed the House this year but has yet to make headway in the Senate. Most Republicans are vocally opposed to it.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: agw; bookreview; bush; capandtax; capandtrade; energy; garbage; globalwarming; latimer; mattlatimer; obamabot; oohahh; rino; rubbish; speechless; tellall; troll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: sickoflibs; Impy; steelyourfaith
*Ping!*
2
posted on
09/24/2009 2:35:01 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
(So many Communists, so little time.)
To: rabscuttle385
About quite a few issues, Bush was not a good guy. This is one of them, along with immigration policy and the presecription drug debacle.
3
posted on
09/24/2009 2:37:02 PM PDT
by
RatRipper
(I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
To: rabscuttle385
GWBush endorsed cap and trade in a speech and no one knew? Then how do we know he endorsed it?
4
posted on
09/24/2009 2:38:38 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Legalism reinforces self-righteousness - it communicates to you the good news of your own goodness)
To: rabscuttle385
Dubbya did a lot of right things.
But he was on the wrong (RINO) side of a lot of things, too.
Fortunately the things he was on the right side about were the important things.
5
posted on
09/24/2009 2:38:43 PM PDT
by
grobdriver
(Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
To: rabscuttle385
Wall Street types get teary-eyed and start salivating whenever they start thinking about a carbon credits derivatives market....so yes, I suppose someone could convince him its a good idea.
To: rabscuttle385
He had a funny way of supporting it. He didn’t.
7
posted on
09/24/2009 2:39:14 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: rabscuttle385
This is BS.
Most of the garbage you post is.
8
posted on
09/24/2009 2:39:46 PM PDT
by
Cedric
To: rabscuttle385
Bush always struck me as more of a globalist and a NWO enthusiast than a true conservative, so this is no surprise.
I'll give him credit for protecting our nation from another large-scale attack and lowering taxes, but not much else.
9
posted on
09/24/2009 2:40:15 PM PDT
by
Deo volente
("Mmm, mmm, mmm...Barack Hussein Obama." God save our children!)
To: rabscuttle385
That is one reason why he had dismal approval ratings. As I recall most of us were shell shocked by his actions.
10
posted on
09/24/2009 2:41:56 PM PDT
by
Nuc1
(NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
To: rabscuttle385
Matt Latimer strikes again.
Hey isn't this the same guy that claimed that Bush had never heard of Sarah Plain before, only it turns out that Bush had actually met Sarah Palin at Alaska Airport when he was on his way to the Beijing Olympics?
What kind of a weasel is this Matt Latimer anyway?
He sounds like a pretty nasty character, who will do anything for money.
Note to self: Never buy any book for this snake oil salesman.
To: RatRipper
Ill wait till I hear it from him ....no telling what he said about cap and trade..he might have just looked at the possibility ...There is a long way from saying you like something and actually doing it
This guy might sell his book though
12
posted on
09/24/2009 2:46:41 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: rabscuttle385
Why am I not surprised that a Connecticut liberal would favor such a nasty thing cast upon America?
13
posted on
09/24/2009 2:47:17 PM PDT
by
Cheetahcat
(Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
To: rabscuttle385
Bush ate puppies for breakfast while living in the WH.
14
posted on
09/24/2009 2:47:55 PM PDT
by
rabidralph
(http://www.thealaskafundtrust.com/ http://www.sarahpac.com)
To: rabscuttle385
Nonsense! He opposed that crap. Kyoto is cap and trade.
15
posted on
09/24/2009 2:50:12 PM PDT
by
avacado
To: Cedric
To: rabscuttle385
He probley does along with McStupid, socialist pair of nit-wits.
17
posted on
09/24/2009 2:53:15 PM PDT
by
stockpirate
("I came NOT to bring peace but a sword." - Jesus Christ)
To: SmokingJoe
To: grobdriver
Fortunately the things he was on the right side about were the important things. Let's see...He was pro-life, so the judges he appointed were pro-life. That's good. He was pro-military. He built up the CIA from its sorry state, he tore down Gorelick's Wall. He kept us safe for 8 years. He was a decent, good man. His wife was a model First Lady.
Those are undeniably good things. I could enumerate his failings, but I'd be ecstatic to have him back again, instead of this Wrecking Ball in Chief.
19
posted on
09/24/2009 2:56:29 PM PDT
by
giotto
To: rabscuttle385
Matt Lattimer shocker! "I'm having George Bush's love child!"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson