Posted on 09/21/2009 4:23:24 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
I’ve always admired both players skill and often wondered in Karpov could have beaten Bobby in 75.
isn’t that a tad early in the game for both players to have lost their queens?
oh wait! those are extra queens in case a pawn makes it across the board. sorry!!!
I’ve taken up chess recently after a lapse of several years. I seem to have gotten better for the time off.
There are two queens not in play, but I see two others on the board. So who knows.
Certain variations of some openings include an early trading of queens.
I think Fischer knew Karpov would’ve handed him his ass, so he wussed out and “retired” to preserve his legacy. ...a contemptible creature in every respect.
The Karpov-Kasparov matches represented chess at its absolute pinnacle.
I always seemed to do better at speed chess than the regular timed game against the same opponent — stronger at quick ‘n’ dirty analysis, I guess...
Those matches with these two would be intriguing to watch.
Not to be confused with one of the funniest videos of all time including, Kasparov.
No serious player believes this.
As for Karpov-Kasperov, there definitely was some good. (I attended a couple of the games) But I think you're forgetting all those draws.
ML/NJ
I think you overrate Karpov's chances. Fischer would have probably won after a rocky start where he would have to play himself into form, after not playing a single top-level game in 3 years. However, Fischer was beyond play at this point. Very sad. What a waste.
The Karpov-Kasparov matches were quite different that the exciting Fischer/Spassky encounter. And I leave it to those who know better than I to comment on the quality of the play of the two Kar/Kas matches.
I’m guessing that the level of play where they are emotional attachment to any piece is minimal. Detached sacrifice of a strong piece for a strategic gain or to minimize a loss to an opponent’s superior strategy is difficult for most non-professional players.
It's too bad they'll only be playing games under accelerated time controls. I'd like to see the best of 10 under the old standard 40 in 2.5.
“Handed him his ass” may have been a little strong, but the Karpov of the mid-late ‘70s was superior to a mentally fragile Fischer of that same period (and later). A prime BF vs. a prime Karpov would’ve been another story entirely.
does anyone have a link for this ?
Placemarker!
Tal was around til '92. Did these guys ever face him?
And we need to find where this will be on the internet.
Help!
yitbos
Draw. (GK was 19 or 20).
Tal vs. Karpov, Brussels, 1987
Winner: Tal (he was 50)
I found a rundown of Tal vs. Fischer. Seems Fischer beat Tal 4-3 over over about 12 years.
yitbos
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.