Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: This Just In

the reporter also states that O- is a common blood type.
It is not. Only about 7% of all people have Type O negative blood. http://chapters.redcross.org/br/northernohio/INFO/bloodtype.html

This reporter is a moron.

Pity, since the UK press is usually much better than in the US, even the liberal press.


7 posted on 09/18/2009 10:56:52 PM PDT by Wiseghy ( ARE YOU BETTER OFF THAN YOU WERE $4 TRILLION DOLLARS AGO?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Wiseghy

No decency in regards to the facts. At the very least the reporter could have shown more respect for the grieving family.


9 posted on 09/18/2009 11:04:46 PM PDT by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Wiseghy

Re: Blood types. People with O- blood are universal donors but not universal recipients. On the other hand, had the woman been AB+ she could have received any blood type.


22 posted on 09/19/2009 4:44:02 AM PDT by reg45 (Be calm everyone. The idiot children are in charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Wiseghy

Every hospital usually has O neg on hand since it’s universal donor blood. In this case it would have been at least type specific for this patient.


33 posted on 09/25/2009 8:05:10 PM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson