Yea OK, and?
Here's what I commented on: "The company has banned the man accused of beating a mother at one of its restaurants from all of its locations for life.
This CCB outfit, has an awful lot of stores y'know.
We're not talking about casinos in LV, now.
Follow?
"If the facts as represented are accurate, they had a perfect right, nay, an obligation to ban this buffoon."
I'd agree, being one who respects private property & all that. {BTW OT, just wondering. Do people living in MA naturally start talking like Patrick Henry? LOL} /jk'g
"He struck a woman, sir. After nearly hitting her child with a door."
He's fortunate all he faces is getting tossed from a two-bit restaurant chain & a small fine of some kind. Could've been much worse for the old goat physically & financially.
"I agree, if the races of the individuals involved had been swapped, the consequences would have been entirely different."
Goes without saying.
Be that as it may, my comment was inspired by this pull-quote: "The beating is leading some state lawmakers to consider pushing for a Georgia Hate Crime Law."
Guess you're not a fan of Frank Zappa. You'd have caught the reference to "Sears'". Mocks the whole "hate crime" baloney, ala Frank Zappa.
Laws are laws & should be enforced as such.
He would be probably known to someone in the Cracker Barrel near where he lives or moves to. Just the threat has deterent value.