Let's get this straight. Her client's civil rights were violated by not giving her a jury trial? So Orly thinks it is her client on trial?
Taitz has no idea what she is talking about. She's a nutjob.
I do not have an opinion about her sanity, but the passage you quote doesn't mean she thinks her client is on trial. A plaintiff, and for that matter a defendant in any civil case has a presumptive right to a jury trial. It doesn't mean the plaintiff is "on trial". Just that they have a right to a trial of the issues.