[normanpubbie]

Did you mean 63, 79, and 110?

I found #85 interesting, even fascinating. But then I wrote it :)

Yes, I found your comments interesting.

Re post 110: On the conflation part, that's my story and I'm sticking to it.

But I must commend you for going back to the source documents and basing your assertions on them. I wish more FReepers would back up what they say.

[Lucky Dog]

But I must commend you for going back to the source documents and basing your assertions on them. I wish more FReepers would back up what they say.

Thank you. Allow me to return the compliment. Such action makes for a far more civilized and informed debate.

Re post 110: On the conflation part, that's my story and I'm sticking to it.

In that case, I fear we must agree to disagree. However, as another poster observed, the fact that we are discussing the Articles of Confederation is indicator of the difference in the educations we received contrasted with that noted in the article that began this thread.