Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SAJ; NVDave
Looks like the stuff was bought for about 70 cents on the dollar?

A little better than the 100 cents on the dollar the taxpayers paid AIG?

Is that a less than 30% anticipated default rate?

yitbos

3 posted on 09/16/2009 6:28:15 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bruinbirdman

70 is better than i expected


7 posted on 09/16/2009 6:34:02 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Better check your math.

Looks to me that $1.3 billion in assets were purchased for $64.2 million in cash and a small amount of funny money.

11 posted on 09/16/2009 7:00:05 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Gunslingers at play. Watch out.

Need a lot more information than the article provides in order to run an analysis.

Personally, I'd much rather play in traffic than spec poisoned 'assets' such as these.

16 posted on 09/16/2009 9:03:31 PM PDT by SAJ (way too late to 'work within the system'. just about time for rebellion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman; SAJ

Back up a sec and look at who provided the leverage for the deal: We sucker taxpayers.

Starting from that point, now work your way through a “margin call” for these assets if the default rate goes to a point where all the money the “private investors” put into the deal is consumed by mark-to-reality accounting of dubious loans and irrecoverable debt.

When you do, what you see is this: the “private sector” gets a big piece of the upside, and we taxpayers are holding the bag on the downside, UNLESS the details of the agreement allow for what would effectively be a “margin call” demanding that the investors put up more cash to hold onto their position.

I seriously doubt that such a clause is going to be enforced on these investors...

If I could get a deal like this, heck, I’d buy some of this crap paper. But there’s no way the FDIC is going to offer a guy like me who asks protologically annoying questions about bank balance sheets and loan terms to play in their game.


17 posted on 09/16/2009 9:21:53 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson