Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hawk720

“plaintiff unashamedly alleges that defendant has the burden to prove his ‘natural born’ status,”

Oh My God, the “burden to prove”, Mr.Obama had plenty of time during the elections to prove he was legal, don’t give me this crap that it’s a “burden” to unseal a document and prove that he’s a “natural born” citizen.


29 posted on 09/16/2009 4:58:44 PM PDT by bauerpauer ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."-Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: bauerpauer

Oh My God, the “burden to prove”, Mr.Obama had plenty of time during the elections to prove he was legal, don’t give me this crap that it’s a “burden” to unseal a document and prove that he’s a “natural born” citizen.


That to me is the nut of the entire case. No where to my knowledge is there in the US Constitution, Federal Law or State Law a provision specifying what proof/document is required and to whom shall it be provide [states, Electoral College or Congress when they certify the election results] as proof that a candidate is a Natural Born Citizen in order to run and be elected President of the USA.

To my thinking that needs to be corrected by Constitutional Amendment, Federal Law or individual state law in order to bring a halt to this type problem and require all candidates from this date forward to provide that proof/document.


34 posted on 09/16/2009 5:26:20 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson