Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
So, he reprimands counsel for her political rhetoric and then winds up his notes with some empty political rhetoric!?!

No, in context he uses those figures to argue that if there were any doubt about Obama's eligibility, it could have been brought up during the election.

11 posted on 09/16/2009 4:10:33 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

This is exactly the same thing as happened with Mr. Hemenway in the Second Circuit. The same charge of “frivolous”, the same warning about sanctions. Well, Mr. Hemenway did the judge one good by pointing out that if he was sanctioned then he was entitled to see the document for exoneration. The judge backed off.

But now, it looks like Capt. Cook is forced to face court martial to get the document released. Tough call.


13 posted on 09/16/2009 4:15:39 PM PDT by bioqubit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian

It is the same kind of empty political rhetoric. It is meaningless and non-sequitur.


20 posted on 09/16/2009 4:37:22 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I saw the first complaint in March, 2008. It got hot in June,2008 and has continued until present. That was well before the election but no one in the media or an authority position would touch it. WHY?????


47 posted on 09/17/2009 1:11:19 PM PDT by Jude in WV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson