Here’s an angle to try. Show the court that Obama lied to the Supreme Court of Illinois, which can be proven. He lied to them when he said he had no aliases. Goes to Obama’s credibility. If he lied before to a court he can do it again. The object here is to get a judge to motion for discovery.
Here’s an angle to try. Show the court that Obama lied to the Supreme Court of Illinois, which can be proven. He lied to them when he said he had no aliases.
If that were true, and if that related to the case, then yes, that would be a valuable piece of evidence to have.
However, as the (wonderful) conservative blogger Jeff Schrieber
demonstrated last August 2008, that claim of perjury on the IL ARDC is NOT accurate. The only "alias" that must be reported to the IL ARDC are legal names that one has used AFTER being admitted to the bar. There is no evidence that Obama used any other name after being admitted to the Illinois bar.