Skip to comments.
Judge tosses out Army captain's complaint questioning president's birth; Orly Taitz on notice
http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/breaking_news/story/841419.html ^
Posted on 09/16/2009 9:48:30 AM PDT by vikk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 281-286 next last
To: TADSLOS
Who is Barack Obama really, and who is helping cover his tracks?
Great post...
The answer to the last one....unfortunately, many people who would have classified as “conservative” are helping him cover his tracks....the ones like some of the posters on here....media types like Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, and others who refer to Birthers as “nuts”
The sad part is that there are so many Obama Enablers on both sides....and makes you wonder why such attitude against people who are only asking for proof of his eligibility to be President
101
posted on
09/16/2009 11:03:37 AM PDT
by
UCFRoadWarrior
(America is still great....no matter what Globalists, Communists, Anti-Birthers, Terrorists think)
To: UCFRoadWarrior
LOL, now THAT’S a scary thought!
102
posted on
09/16/2009 11:03:47 AM PDT
by
thecraw
(Follower of Jesus...American...Tennessean...Birther! You Betcha!)
To: roaddog727
The case to which Orly was referring is the case in CALIFORNIA. Not this one in GEORGIAThere is a motion to dismiss the California case pending. Orly hasn't responded to it yet. (She has 4 more days). No eligibility case has survived a motion to dismiss yet.
To: IntolerantOfTreason
So she previously felt unable to obey illegal orders from an illegal chain of command ... but now shes fine following them, for some reason? Something tells me shes not as principled as you. She did her duty to determine if her CIC is legitimate. Judge Land just said that he is the legitimate CIC. Therefore Judge Land is now on the hook and he will face a higher court that will hold him accountable for his decision today.
104
posted on
09/16/2009 11:04:37 AM PDT
by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: OldDeckHand
Do you happen to have a link for the ruling in this case? It's not in the Ledger-Enquirer story, from what I can tell. I would like to read it in its entirety. Thanks!
Yes:
Opinion
To: Drew68
Although your point is credible....with all the skeletons in the Clinton’s closet....and the ACORN people....Obama would have had a field day with Hillary if she raised the BC issue. And, unlike conservatives, the media would have let Obama get away with bringing up Hillary’s baggage.
She had to keep her mouth shut. She was in checkmate with Obama
106
posted on
09/16/2009 11:11:25 AM PDT
by
UCFRoadWarrior
(America is still great....no matter what Globalists, Communists, Anti-Birthers, Terrorists think)
To: roaddog727
The case to which Orly was referring is the case in CALIFORNIA. Not this one in GEORGIA Oops. I seem to have confused the case where Orly was promising to neutralize Obama by using the Heisenberg Compensator to depolarize subatomic fluctuations, with the case where Orly promised to crawl through the Jeffries Tube, and neutralize Obama with a stream of reverse tachyon particles.
My bad.
107
posted on
09/16/2009 11:19:11 AM PDT
by
Pilsner
To: Pilsner
108
posted on
09/16/2009 11:20:51 AM PDT
by
roaddog727
(It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
To: Aria
Very disappointed to hear Rush say this morning that he does not care where Obama was born.
To: Churchillspirit
I have very little hope that this will pan out to be anything... whether he was born in Kenya, or not. The wheels of justice have a big wrench in them put there by the rats and others who don’t want a constitutional crisis or Obama embarrassed by whatever is on the long form.
Wonder if we’ll ever find out the truth. I hate the arrogance of Obama and his gang doing this to us.
110
posted on
09/16/2009 11:41:08 AM PDT
by
Aria
( "The US republic will endure until Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the people's $.")
To: Genoa
Apparently Chester Arthur was also concerned about his father being a British subject and kept it secret until after he had served his term!
Μολὼν λάβε
111
posted on
09/16/2009 11:41:59 AM PDT
by
wastoute
(translation of tag "Come and get them (bastards)" or "come get some")
To: Uncle Chip
>Judge Land is now on the hook and he will face a higher court that will hold him accountable for his decision today
Is he on The List
to be taken away by
UFOs at night?
To: DoughtyOne
"His comments about monies spent by Obamas Democrat opponents, and the $85 million McCain had at his disposal cant be taken any other way than to depict Obama as an underdog." He wasn't depicting Obama as an underdog. He was illustrating that Obama has had multiple well-funded opponents during his campaign that presumably had access to a wellspring of opposition research available on Obama. And, none of those opponents voiced ANY concerns, let alone substantive concerns about Obama's eligibility based on facts, not conjecture and supposition.
That fact, added to the absolute absence of any evidence presented by Orly in her pleading speaks volumes about the merits of this case, or so this court (and several others) found.
The citation by land of the campaign opposition war-chests had nothing to do with Obama has an "underdog". You should read the decision.
113
posted on
09/16/2009 11:46:16 AM PDT
by
OldDeckHand
(No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
To: Uncle Chip
Judge Land is now on the hook and he will face a higher court that will hold him accountable for his decision today. Do you really think Rhodes will appeal?
To: Smokeyblue; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; BP2; ...
Thanks, Smokeyblue.
The site pests are here, too.
115
posted on
09/16/2009 11:58:50 AM PDT
by
LucyT
To: theFIRMbss
Is he on The List to be taken away by UFOs at night? No -- he just returned from one of those trips over the weekend as evidenced by his statement that "it would appear that ample opportunity existed for discovery of evidence that would support any contention that the president was not eligible for the office he sought.
His imagination is getting the better part of his logic.
116
posted on
09/16/2009 12:01:31 PM PDT
by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: Lurking Libertarian
An Appelate Court is not the court I was referring to.
117
posted on
09/16/2009 12:03:41 PM PDT
by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: Lurking Libertarian
Gary Kreep has responded.
118
posted on
09/16/2009 12:04:05 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: mnehring; Lord_Baltar
There is one school that thinks it does not list SAD as the mother. Wouldn’t that be fun!
119
posted on
09/16/2009 12:08:10 PM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Nemo me impune lacessit The law will be followed, dammit!)
To: Lord_Baltar
“Yeah, start throwing around the word Bastard, my FRiend, and those of us that fall into that category might not be all to pleased...”
Then perhaps you should take your issue up with your mother. You are what you are due to no fault of your own.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 281-286 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson