Posted on 09/12/2009 8:58:43 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Not a surprise.
When Boma was giving his speech the other night, a camera
shot of her sitting with a look of concern, not cheering on.
Am no fan of DiFi but on few occasions she will give more thought to a bill unlike Babs Botoxer who is down the line
Left.
Exactly. These liberals put self interest above all else, no principles, no scruples. She is sensing trouble in paradise.
The cameras at one point during Obama’s speech panned Senator Feinstein. Everyone around her was clapping like crazy and she just sat there with a benign look on her face and was definitely not clapping. At the time I thought it was odd. We will most certainly be calling her office next week. What the heck. Boxer on the other hand is a lost cause.
Feinstein will vote for Obamacare, in spite of the disaster it obviously will be. She will dutifully vote “yea” because it is more important to close ranks with the Party and win one for the team than to do the responsible and prudent thing and vote “no.”
She goes with waht the polls say. I was going to write that she was a poll watcher, but that seems so wrong.
bookmark
That's a terribly precise number.
“We can’t afford “free healthcare” at this time.”
We can’t afford “free healthcare” EVER.
There is a practical reason our Founding Fathers wanted limited government.
The federal government is an incompetent landlord.
if difi is saying this, i must rethink my position on this issue, i haven’t agreed with one thing she has said in 30 years.
At least she is still ugly, in this respct dems rarely disappoint.
Feinstein is 100% in favor of “insider” capitalism — as long as it enriches her hubby’s business enterprises. Obama must be putting the pinch on some of her crony-capitalist sweetheart deals.
Oh no, here we go again: using the Interstate Commerce Clause to help concentrate more power into Washington & away from the states. I thought that tyrannical mindset was one of the many things that today's protest was supposed to be AGAINST!
Sure, I would love to see the American people have the choice of buying insurance from any company across the nation -- but does it have to be done via the force of the federal government? Can't We The People get more involved in our own state government & have the state legislatures make the changes themselves?
AGAIN, I say that the Republicans are no different from the Dims when it comes to twisting the meaning of the ICC, ignoring the 10th Amendment, & empowering the feds over the states...it's just the specific issues on which they disagree. The end result has proven to be a massive irresponsible behemoth lovated in D.C.
Bet you are correct about Bama squeeze on Feinstein’s financial ‘empire’ somehow. Feinstein also caused a flap objecting when Leon Panetta got hired to lead the CIA. There’s some love lost between DiFi and the Zero—maybe more stuff hidden behind the scenes.
And why was she chosen to MC the inauguration stage? Bama placating her somehow?
Great pictures of 9/12 DC! Great.
That is interesting. I wonder who....I sure hope Beck has security.
Feinstein most likely favors a one-payer system i.e. the government, but she’s probably looked at the numbers (and her own chances of re-election) and figured out they don’t add up. I’d bet many Dems, even the hard leftists, are looking at Obama’s health-care pipe dream and are concluding it’s more like a crack-pipe dream. From a crackpot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.