Notice she does not say *what* vital records, or wether they are "original" documents, or amended documents.
Considering that she, or anyone, is not, under the law, supposed to reveal the contents of any such "vital records", why did she make that statement?
Clearly because she is part of an ancient and mysterious conspiracy that is funded by George Soros and involves nearly every single person in the HI Department of Vital records, to include the Republican governor Linda Lingle, all her political appointees and career civil servants who report to her. They have a team of lawyers to carefully construct their statements in order to protect a guy that they know, without equivocation, was born someplace other than HI. And, this conspiracy was started at least 48 or so years ago.
Who else is involved in the conspiracy? Every Republican member of Congress who hasn't publicly called for and demanded congressional hearings. Every member of the US judiciary that has thus-far dismissed everyone of these birther lawsuits. Every member of the US Supreme Court have on multiple occasion denied certiorari (without comment) on a number of these cases, including one John Roberts, who actually swore the President into office, twice.
Every conservative legal foundation including, but not limited to Judicial Watch, the Federalist Society and the Thomas More Law Center.
Every conservative national talk-show host or commentator who's refused to entertain this silliness in anyway including Mark Levin, Ann Coulter, Neal Boortz (all of whom are accomplished lawyers) Sean Hannity and Monica Crowley.
Every publisher of any well-respected conservative magazine or periodical including those that publish National Review, American Conservative, The American Prospect and the Weekly Standard.
Or, at least that's what someone would have to believe if they were to buy into your absolutely preposterous idea.
And just for the record, who's the primary legal mind behind the anti-conspiracy movement? Non other than a Orange County immigrant dentist who got her law degree from an on-line university and has never - before this case - earned a single penny or had a single client in the practice of law. Compelling. I see how you could be so moved by such a powerfully authoritative conservative legal scholar, litigator and master practitioner in all things legal - but is apparently whipped by her word processing spell checker.
It's all a bit much to swallow, isn't it? And yet, when somebody who's not certifiably crazy points out the gaping holes in these conspiracy theorist's arguments, their absolute misrepresentations of the federal rules of civil procedures and what is normal order of business in American jurisprudence they're labeled: trolls, obots, kool-aid drinkers, liars, thieves, paid hacks etc, etc, etc. Nope, I'm not a part of the birther cabal - and I couldn't care less what crazy people call me.