[BP2]

Note that NONE of the motions from the US Attorneys
Office reference THIS ...

... only procedural grounds to dismiss.

I'm sure there's NO reason for it ...

[Red Steel]

LoL!

[rxsid]

Indeed, I think cause they know better than to reference that worthless jpeg floating out in the ethers...

[Non-Sequitur]

I'm sure there's NO reason for it ...

What would that reason be?

[Cyropaedia]

Note that NONE of the motions from the US Attorneys Office reference THIS ...

Yep. And that CAN'T be an oversight on their part. It shows you that even they know that the internet CoLB has problems...

[Lurking Libertarian]

... only procedural grounds to dismiss. I'm sure there's NO reason for it ...

You don't understand federal court practice. A motion to dismiss cannot rely on any evidence proffered by the defendant. The only basis for a motion to dismiss is to say that, even if all of the facts claimed by the plaintiff are true, the case must still be dismissed. Therefore, the only possible grounds for a motion to dismiss are the procedural issues raised by the DOJ.

[steviep96]

Because you don’t argue facts on procedural motions?