Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: curiosity
NO, what I said was untrue was your assertion that the clerk put in the race of the father, not the father.

The clerk typed up the form from the inputs of the "informant", which could be either parent. The clerk has a standard list of terms. One of those was negro, which in '61 was the proper term for BHO Sr. BHO Jr can call himself whatever he wants, and the current form, that you provided a link for, allows for checking more than one box. It would be interesting to see what was checked on the BCs of his daughters for "race of father".

1,124 posted on 09/13/2009 10:12:13 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1081 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

You may be falling into the obamanoid trap. We have no way of knowing what is on any document from whatever year int eh Hawaiian Vital Records. We don’t know what may be listed as race of father or even if father is listed. The obamanoids are trying their damndest to establish a default lie that someone in the public has seen or that there actually exist things that have not been enumerated. It is a clever ploy don’t ya think, nudging you into accepting their false axiom?


1,126 posted on 09/13/2009 10:17:19 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson