When you seek to deceive readers, it is a well documented technique to assume as axiomatic the very thing you are debating authenticity over. You have assumed that Hawaii has even seen to compare the exhibited fraudulent items Barry claims are authentic. They have actually stated contrary. But then I'm sure you know that and continue to try that deceit.
Your techniques of deceit are just disgusting in the main, and so much more transparent than you could even imagine. To display yourself so shamefully you must be getting a hefty remuneration for the spectacle.
You keep saying "items" plural, when I only know of one item, the "certification" that Obama has displayed to attempt to prove he was born in Hawaii.
I have not heard anything about Hawaiian officials denying that they have compared the Certification with their records. Dr. Fukino stated in July that she had "seen the original vital records" regarding Obama's birth. Yes, perhaps she did not have Obama's certification in hand while she was doing this, but do you really think she is so lacking in curiosity that she has never looked at it online?
Your techniques of deceit are just disgusting in the main, and so much more transparent than you could even imagine. To display yourself so shamefully you must be getting a hefty remuneration for the spectacle.
I think you have crossed the line to paranoia. Why would someone want give me a hefty remuneration for arguing that Obama SHOULD release his original birth certificate?