[[If by “proponenets” it was intended that I limit my observatations to the actual authors of the theory and disregard the arguments of those not directly involved with it, I can do that.]]
I haven’t seen many that do reject Macroevolution simply because “ID is proven because it cannot be disproven,” and “any competing theory is disprove because it has not been proven. “ Most reject it based on which proposal presents the most reasonable evidnece- they reject Macroevolution because it violates several scientific principles, and does so not insignificantly, but rather severely. Yes, some people don’t delve too deeply, and might say htose htigns you claim. howver, most people who have looked into the issues, and have even a basic understanding of hte issues, do not reject macroeovlution based on what you claim- Seems you’ve painted the whoel group with one broad brushstroke.
Do you see any who reject Macroevolution because it conflicts with their religious beliefs, but try to use flawed or just plain wrong scientific arguments to rationalize it?