Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BP2
And the great thing is even if Orly can't move forward with this judge, the primer has been cracked as to how to move beyond any "lack of standing" issues that have plagued prior eligibility cases.

How so?

634 posted on 09/09/2009 9:45:55 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur; Uncle Chip; mkjessup; campaignPete R-CT; SeaHawkFan; Red Steel; MHGinTN; pissant; ...

And the great thing is even if Orly can't move forward with this judge, the primer has been cracked as to how to move beyond any “lack of standing” issues that have plagued prior eligibility cases.

How so?

My intellectually-dishonest FRiend — I shall not be divulging that to an obvious obfuscator as yourself.

But as I've said elsewhere, the answer lies within “KEITH LANCE ET AL. v. MIKE COFFMAN”, “FRED HOLLANDER v. JOHN MCCAIN” and others.

Kudos to Orly, who seems to be listening. Kreep and others will keep things on track.


641 posted on 09/09/2009 10:04:21 AM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson