Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
The U.S. Attorneys submitted a motion for dismissal just prior to the hearing.

Correct. They also noticed that motion for hearing on October 5. In other words, when they filed the motion, they affirmatively showed that they did not expect it to be heard on September 8.

As I understand it, what the DOJ wanted yesterday - and did NOT get - was for the Court to issue an immediate stay of discovery pending the October 5 hearing. I think that the DOJ told the court that they will be filing a formal motion or application to stay discovery (pending the Oct. 5 hearing) on Friday.
611 posted on 09/09/2009 8:24:07 AM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies ]


To: Sibre Fan; All
For info as regards to the motion filed by the US Attorney for the hearing scheduled on Oct. 5, 2009. To read the entire motion go the link provided.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BARACK H. OBAMA, et al.
Defendants.

No. SACV 09-00082 DOC (ANx)
DATE: October 5, 2009
TIME: 8:30 a.m.
CTRM: 9D
Hon. David O. Carter

(1) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS; AND
(2) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS

Motion


616 posted on 09/09/2009 8:36:13 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson