In a criminal case, the jury, despite a judge telling them they have to apply the law as he gives it to them, have a constitutional right to determine if a law is just or if the application of the law in a particular case is just.
In short, Taitz does not have a right to a jury trial in this case. Besides, given the behavior and statements by Judge Carter, why would any intelligent person want a jury.
On top of all that, even if Taitz was entitled to a jury trial, she was required to demand it when she filed her initial complaint.
On top of all that, even if Taitz was entitled to a jury trial, she was required to demand it when she filed her initial complaint.