To: TheBigIf
I just read the Court order and there is one part that stands out as NOT good at all.
I read pretty much the whole order as “not good” for Orly at all. She lost every motion she filed. The judge characterized her actions as “improper.” The judge forced her to file a “joint opposition” to the motion to dismiss with Kreep. The judge said that the parties agreed on tentative schedule (he didn’t order it). I mean, I can’t find any good news for Orly in the Order.
To: Sibre Fan
Well there is plenty that I have read as being good. Like the fact that this judge wants to give this case a chance to be head on it’s merits. Like the fact that he included the fact that he would closly work on the issue of discovery with the other judge. etc....
This case is still moving on.
To: Sibre Fan
The good news is the judge didn't give Orly any special treatment but the case is proceeding. Yes Orly didn't get her petty motions, so what? She can refile the previously dismissed motion re the BC, which apparently she has already done. The court is being fair and following the rules and making the attys follow the rules, that's all we can ask. If they get past the motion to dismiss then there will be a trial lacking an unforeseen and unlikely summary judgment.
Then again, Obama can settle the case by admitting he is ineligible.
372 posted on
09/08/2009 7:54:25 PM PDT by
rolling_stone
(no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
To: Sibre Fan
Here's another take:
The second issue was a snit on the plaintiff's side. Taitz had originally worked with attorney Gary Kreep in Wiley Drake's lawsuit against Obama, the case that has since blossomed into Barnett v. Obama. At some point, Kreep, Drake and co-plaintiff Markham Robinson decided to part ways with Taitz. Taitz refused to sign a change-of-attorney form, and then filed a motion stating Drake and Robinson's desire to be removed from the lawsuit. Those two plaintiffs say they authorized Taitz to do no such thing. Carter, very much taking the tone of a teacher scolding children, called a 15-minute recess and told Taitz and Kreep to work it out. When court resumed, Taitz lit into Kreep with a litany of ways that she said he had botched the suit against Obama. Carter wasn't pleased. "I think what I'm going to do is force you two together [in one lawsuit]," Carter said. "I don't know if I can legally do this, you can take it to the 9th Circuit if you like and delay it longer." He then made the two bickering lawyers move their chairs next to one another. "I'm very visual," he said. "I need to see you two as one."
Orly Taitz's Day in Court
379 posted on
09/08/2009 7:56:27 PM PDT by
deport
To: Sibre Fan
"I mean, I cant find any good news for Orly in the Order." But, there's plenty of good news on the entertainment front. In 25 years of practice, I've never heard a judge (or even heard about a judge) tell to two lawyers, on the same side, to "push their chairs closer together" - in open court, no less. C'mon, that's comedy gold and surely a story to be told to every 1L in the country.
387 posted on
09/08/2009 8:02:29 PM PDT by
OldDeckHand
(No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
To: Sibre Fan; All
You couldn’t find anything good for Orly if it bit you in the face.
What a biased., aggressive agenda to harm Orly any which way you can.
Get real. Actually this is your real. Really nasty toward soeone who is doing our nation a huge favor as besgt she can and without help from the likes of you
524 posted on
09/09/2009 2:39:05 AM PDT by
FARS
( Be happy, Be well)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson