Posted on 09/06/2009 6:27:00 PM PDT by smoothsailing
In pointing out all the made up rights such as abortion, things done in the name of research, things done "for the govt. good", this author is clearly and cleverly proving that Sarah is not crazy and so states in the last line. Good article--READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE!
vaudine
I’m talking in the national dialog sense. It’s not an insult at all to each citizen who stood up and had their finger bitten off.
She was the one who coined the term Death Panels which the WH couldn’t defend and rilled everyone up. And she is right.
Unfortunately, there are plenty of people in the conservative movement who view Sarah the same way many libs view Obama - as a Messiah.
Why no barf alert?
And the author is correct - when immersed in these murky Constitutional waters, night can become day. For example, asset forfeiture is so blatantly and specifically against the Fourth Amendment that it is mind-boggling that it passed scrutiny by the SC. The latter, for all its virtues, is a historically poor guardian in the matter.
One notes the Parthian shot "It was only voluntary end-of-life counseling!" uttered over the shoulders of the rapidly retreating Obots as they quickly spiked the offending clause. In fact, it was, but not from the point of view of the patient. It was at the doctor's, and the panel's volition. "Death Panel" isn't much of a stretch at all in the bill as it was written; if the author is correct what it would have become was no stretch at all.
Because none is called for.
I’m already guilty once today of not reading all the way through. :-)
Learned my lesson did I.
“Unfortunately, there are plenty of people in the conservative movement who view Sarah the same way many libs view Obama - as a Messiah.”
Says the Rudy Guiliani/Mitt Romney girl. If you are a fan of Meg Whitman also which I assume that you are, then here is a video of her promoting Van Jones that you may enjoy, she is very moderate and is not one of those icky conservatives.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSn37TMXZO8&feature=player_embedded
That is necessarily the case. 99% of doctors can be highly ethical, but the other 1% can bring a nightmare of horrific proportions. And while it is that 1% that need to be controlled, the other 99% have shown an unwillingness to do it.
The 1% effectively shield themselves with a combination of scientific adventurism, professional courtesy, and the pretense that efforts to control their ethical abuses are corrupt and ignorant. Galileo was persecuted, and so am I, is hardly an excuse for Frankenstinian horrors inflicted on the helpless and unwilling.
That’s the ticket. Call me names. BTW, I’m a heterosexual male.
Sorry, but one is called for. The way I read the article is that he is pretending to take her side(finally)but he is really trashing her. Barf alert was required.
I wouldn't give them a choice. I'd dump them in Mexico.
Ahh...the irony! ;^)
Neither required nor called for.
However, it is your privilge of course to repost the article later with the alert if you so choose.
Yep, it is required and called for, and no I won’t repost your propaganda post, once is enough, I puked my guts out on this one.
Crazy like a fox
LOL!
Good Grief y’all ! I read what I needed to read so that’s that !
And I read past the first sentence.
There are much better articles to read than suffering over someone who starts with a false premise only to think it’s professional, or cute, to then debunk it. Too many articles, too little time to waste.
I also read Sarah Palin’s Facebook post(s). She’s direct and to the point which sits well with me !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.