Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Don Corleone; LucyT

http://americangrandjury.org/

In your link, I hate to ask one question:

The mother’s birth date : 11/29/1942

Only in the USA date format where the month is written first.

If authentic, it should have been written: 29/11/1942

How in the world would this be authentic?

The other dates below, the supervisor signed a day (USA) or a month (European) BEFORE the doctor!

I hope I’m wrong, somehow.


73 posted on 09/04/2009 8:43:26 PM PDT by melancholy (Hey Marxists, don't Crap & Tread on me. Zer0's defeat is now in progress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: melancholy

Also troublesome, the weight and length would be in metric.


74 posted on 09/04/2009 8:45:33 PM PDT by elizabethgrace (WORLD CHAMPIONS - Park View Little League - Chula Vista, CA !!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: melancholy; LucyT

The mother's date of birth as 11/29/42 may have been written down as she told them, or copied from ID she presented, written in the US format.

The attending doctor signed on 8/8/1961

The Supervisor of Obstetrics signed one day before the doctor, and used the US format.

Maybe...maybe he was educated in the US? Lots of maybe's.

81 posted on 09/04/2009 10:07:17 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson