Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Favor Center
It’s the same support and respect any liberal politician should receive from conservatives.

That of course explains why he being the liberal politician that he was...hung in there, fought the war on terror and kept the Homeland safe for eight long years despite the constant character assassination he underwent 24/7!

Plus...you know, in those same 8 years, somehow I fail to remember George W trying to gain control of the internet in order to shut down any & all dissension talk...no, instead he said that was what made out country what it was, the ability to openly disagree with your government.

Good thing for you and all the other sorry ass purist so called conservatives that throw him under the bus every chance you get, huh?

Makes me think you're trying to gain favor with current Communist-in-Chief with your everything is Bush's fault garbage!

406 posted on 09/05/2009 1:14:52 PM PDT by top 2 toe red (O-B-A-M-A = One Big Ass Mistake, America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]


To: top 2 toe red

“That of course explains why he being the liberal politician that he was...hung in there, fought the war on terror and kept the Homeland safe for eight long years despite the constant character assassination he underwent 24/7!”

Tell that “Homeland safe” stuff to the 30,000 victims of illegals on his watch. Oh, wait.. Those good-hearted “citizens” whose family values don’t stop at the Rio Grande.... The very name “Homeland Security” sounds ominous and not in a good way. It wasn’t needed and just made the government bigger. We already have the DoD. The very JOB of the US Army is border defense. That’s why we have an Army. Can’t let national security get in the way of every Juan and Achmed who wants to come kill us, right?

Finally, after caterwauling by conservatives and other America-first folks, they sent the Guard to the border. Only problem is they were ordered to RETREAT if faced with armed men crossing our frontier. Some “Homeland Security” that was.

He didn’t do anything about Saudi involvement/funding in 9/11 or other attacks. He funded al Fatah. He allowed Islamic constitutions in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He turned the war into some Wilsonian nation-building exercise.

“Plus...you know, in those same 8 years, somehow I fail to remember George W trying to gain control of the internet in order to shut down any & all dissension talk...no, instead he said that was what made out country what it was, the ability to openly disagree with your government.”

So, because he wasn’t as liberal as Obama, that makes him a conservative? Is that the argument?

“Good thing for you and all the other sorry ass purist so called conservatives that throw him under the bus every chance you get, huh?”

I don’t expect purity of ideology from a politician. What I do expect is for the head of the GOP to not grow the damn FedGov at a massive rate. I guess expecting him to follow the party platform at least a little bit was too much, right?

“Makes me think you’re trying to gain favor with current Communist-in-Chief with your everything is Bush’s fault garbage!”

Everything isn’t Bush’s fault, clearly. What is also clear is that some things are. Siding with Teddy Kennedy on several agendas WAS!


413 posted on 09/05/2009 3:25:55 PM PDT by Favor Center (Targets up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson