Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TXDuke
I agree if a private is required to report to duty and he doesn’t then he is insubordinate. However, you just validated my argument...the difference between a lawful and unlawful order.

But again, Captain Rhodes has taken it upon herself to decide whether an order is lawful or not. The military does not take kindly to members who do that, and she can and should face a court martial if she refuses to report. Her position is no different than Michael New or Ehren Watada or any soldier or sailor who has been court martialed for refusing to report for duty in Iraq or Afganistan.

143 posted on 09/09/2009 9:05:33 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Please read my other posts. I agreed with you about following a lawful order. However, if credible evidence exists that leads a service member to believe that the order is not valid, then the service member has an obligation to speak up. That is what this court proceding is for. She (and others) believe they have credible evidence showing that the order to deploy is not valid, by proxy of the fact that the person giving the order is not valid. As such, the Cpt has a duty and right to question the order. If done so with credible evidence and in good faith, the the Cpt is not insubordinate. However, if the courts rules against her, then she had her day in court, and should deploy.


145 posted on 09/09/2009 11:16:29 AM PDT by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
she can and should face a court martial
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I bet’cha it would never get that far. Just like Major Cook some reason will be found for her not to deploy.

The discovery process of a court martial would likely lead to Obama being imprisoned, not the Captain.

148 posted on 09/09/2009 11:29:21 AM PDT by wintertime (People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

You mentioned those people that got into trouble for refusing an order, but you also have to keep in mind the Major (I don’t readily remember his name) who recently got his orders rescinded for questioning Obama’s eligibility. Obama instructed the DOJ and DOD not to fight the Major in court, which set a scary precedent.

Many service members now believe the Major called Obama’s bluff and believe that Obama will not court martial them if he is required to show his BC. Obama’s deceptive behavior only fuels the suspicion that he is not eligible.

Now with Obama not being firm on Iraq or Afghan and Obama not taking the advice of his military advisers, many military members believe we will lose the Afghan war and the Iraq war will experience horrible setbacks. As long as the dems have a Vietnam mentality and refuse to allow our military to win the war, then I can’t really blame the military people for being fearful of fighting a losing war with their hands tied behind their backs.


149 posted on 09/09/2009 12:01:31 PM PDT by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson